That is as stupid as NOW.

Is it NOW? Too NOW? It might be a little to NOW.

NOW

NOW

Serious cheeseballs up there at ESPN.

And USC will demand to be declared co-champions if LSU wins the BCS title, just like they did in '03.

ESPN will likely oblige.

Since when is Oklahoma a hot team? Didn't they get their ass kicked by Texas Tech only a couple of weeks ago?

Yeah, but have you looked at Bob Stoops' butt recently? Insert wolf whistle here.

I'm more surprised that Kirk didn't pick Ohio State to beat OU. They love USC so much. They lost to Stanford and Oregon who both are now out of the top 25. What a joke. They always give USC the benefit of the doubt all the time no matter what.

I'll take Oklahoma +4. You know they are going to make the final score a field goal or less difference.

Bradford was hurt early in the Texas Tech game.

tech was up 14 when bradford went out, and then tech ran the ball for the last quarter and a half.

Perfect example of how they create their own hype, and then base their judgments on it. They run a story telling us how great (insert USC player) is. And then they tell us USC will win because they have (insert USC player).

Herbstreit and Corso have been hyping USC and Oklahoma all season, so I am not shocked that they decided those two teams. They suck up to Stoops and Carroll all the time too.

I haven't been paying attention. Have Kirk and Lee agreed in ever matchup so far. What would happen if they didn't? What would be the tiebreaker? And if they have agreed every time, what is the point of them arguing with each other?

Just saw the "championship game" and they agreed. Oklahoma beats USC with a last second FG. They gave OU the edge because of Sam Bradford and the receivers after USC is forced to put 8 in the box to stop the physical running attack of Oklahoma.

Who cares! Corso wears a Merkin!!

dollar,

I was thinking the same thing. Notice Fowler (although not an analyst) isn't involved, he probably realized this was a broke idea.